CineFlix
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

Why would a man frame himself... for murder?

5.7 (347)2009-02-051h 45m
Thriller

Overview

Remake of a 1956 Fritz Lang film in which a novelist's investigation of a dirty district attorney leads to a setup within the courtroom.

Budget
$25,000,000
Revenue
$4,388,563
Production
Aramid Entertainment, Autonomous Films, Foresight Unlimited, Government of Saudi Arabia, Signature Entertainment, RKO Pictures

Tags & Hashtags

Watch Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Online

Video player provided by a third-party service. CineFlix does not host any content.

Official Trailer & More

Videos auto-play in sequence. If a video isn't available in your country, it's automatically skipped.

Cast

Crew

Director
Peter Hyams
Cinematography
Peter Hyams
Composer
David Shire

Where to Watch

Amazon Prime VideoPhiloAmazon Prime Video with AdsHooplaFawesomeAmazon VideoApple TV StoreGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeFandango At Home

Streaming availability data provided by JustWatch via TMDB. Click a logo to visit the provider's official website.

Similar Movies

Recommendations

User Reviews (0)

Sign in with Google to post a rating and review.

  • No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

User Reviews from TMDB

John Chard

John Chard

June 27, 2016

Why would a man frame himself... for murder? Beyond a Reasonable Doubt is directed by Peter Hyams and Hyams adapts the screenplay from Douglas Morrow's story/screenplay for the 1956 film of the same name. It stars Jesse Metcalfe, Amber Tamblyn, Michael Douglas, Joel David Moore and Orlando Jones. Music is by David Shire and Hyams also tackles cinematography duties. C.J. Nicholas (Metcalfe) is a journalist aiming for high things. He is convinced that high profile lawyer Mark Hunter (Dougl…

T

tmdb28039023

September 13, 2022

1/10

The only thing that’s beyond a reasonable doubt here is this movie’s stupidity. The film opens with District Attorney Mark Hunter (Michael Douglas) addressing the jury at a murder trial: “The defense would like to tell you that our entire case is circumstantial. There are no eyewitnesses, no ballistic match, no alibi." Odd. One would think that a prosecutor who has scored 17 murder convictions in a row would view the absence of an alibi as something that favors the prosecution and not the defens…